|Eukarya - The Eukaryotes|
|Taxonomy||phylogeny and hypothetical timeline (not to scale)|
Arch.Paleopr Mesopr Neoproterozoic Phanerozoic o LUCA `--o Eukarya |--Metamonada ------------------------------ `--+--Discicristata ------------------------ `--+--Rhizaria -------------------------- `--o Metabionta |--+--o Chromalveolata: | | |--Alveolata ---------------- | | `--Chromista ---------------- | `--o Archaeplastida | |--Rhodophyta --------------- | `--Chlorobionta ------------ `----------+--Amoebozoa ---------- `--o Opisthokonta |--Fungi --------- `--Metazoa -------
(See also Alternative Eukarya phylogeny)
The Fungi are one of the three major kingdoms of multicelluar eukaryotes. For a long time classified with plants (for example, like plants but unlike animals, their cells of fungi have cell walls), they are now recognised as a distinct major group of organisms. in the Whittaker-Marguelis system of classification of life they are one of the five kingdoms (along with paraphyletic Monera and Protista, as well as plants and animals).
Although superficially reesembling plants, in tbat they are immobile, rooted in place, lacking organs, senses, circulatory, nervous, and other such systems and so on, they feed in a very different way. Unlike plants, fungi do not make their own food through photosynthesis, but like animals derive neutrients from their environment (heterotrophy). Fungi absorb their food while animals ingest it; and rather than feeding on other living organisms, most fungi are decomposers of dead organic matter (like bacteria).
Evolutionarily, Fungi are now considered to be more closely related to animals than to plants, and both are included in a group called Opisthokonta (see phylogeny at top of page). The group seems to have been insignificant before the rise of terrestrial ecosystems in the Silurian and Devonian, but soon made up for that shortcoming by becoming ubiquitious in most terrestrial ecosystems, with many species having an essential symbiotic relationship with plants (Mycorrhizal symbiosis).
Fungi |--Chytridiomycota `--+--o--Zygomycetes | `--Trichomycetes `--+--Basidiomycota | |--Ustilaginomycetes | `--Hymenomycetes `--Ascomycota |--Saccharomycotina `--Pezizomycotina
What are the Fungi?
The Fungi are the great saprophytes, the master recyclers. They are the black rot, the dry rot, and the white rot, the colorful fate of last week's lasagna left too long in the 'fridge, and the great, grey walls of stinking mould that can destroy whole buildings. But, they are also the baker's yeast and the brewer's yeast. They are the difference between grape juice and Chateauneuf du Pape. They are the portobellos and the morels and the cloud ears and the truffles. In fact, the French could not be half so obnoxious about their cuisine were it not for the Fungi. But, then again, perhaps they could .
We leave that conundrum for another day. The first order of business ought to be the matter of definition. How do we define this group? We have found no hint that anyone is using a workable phylogenetic definition of the Fungi. A phylogenetic definition, for those who have somehow managed to escape our interminable, high-pitched whining on the subject, is a definition based on some explicit hypothesis about a group's relative position in phylospace. For example, Dinosauria is defined as the last common ancestor of Triceratops and birds and all descendants of that ancestor. This may be conveniently abbreviated: "Triceratops + birds". Such a definition is quite different from a definition based on some arbitrary set of characteristics which approximate an implicit, unstated, and therefore untestable notion of what a dinosaur "ought" to look like. That second type of definition is referred to as an "apomorphy-based" definition. It is properly viewed with the same derisive contempt with which M. Auguste Escoffier (at right) would regard the use of corn starch to thicken a demi-glace .
Were we in a position to impose a phylogenetic definition on the Fungi, our leading candidate would be the stem group "toadstools > toads" (all organisms more closely related to Basidiomycota than to Tetrapoda ). That definition presupposes a close relationship between Metazoa and Fungi. However, such an assumption shouldn't slow us up much. The Metazoa-Fungi connection now seems quite secure. This definition would, however, require us to gather the Microsporidia into the brotherhood of the Fungi. Microsporidia could be Fungi under many definition of the taxon, but they are certainly closer to Fungi than to toads. Such a definition would also dispense with meaningless arguments about the inclusion of the Chytridiomycota within Fungi.
To our discredit, the foregoing discussion may serve as a useful study in the use of the English conditional mode for advanced students of the language, but it ignores the realities of fungal phylogeny. That reality is illustrated in the following examples.
The "fungi contain cell walls and produce spores" - Madigan et al. (2003). So ferns are Fungi?
The Tree of Life will not venture even this far. It contents itself with a list of common names: "The organisms of the fungal lineage include mushrooms, rusts, smuts, puffballs, truffles, morels, molds, and yeasts, as well as many less well-known organisms." In other words, the fungi are defined by listing a number of vague, vernacular terms with a completely indefinite catch-all category at the end.
"What is Fungi? Fungi are a group of organisms and micro-organisms that are classified within their own kingdom, the fungal kingdom, as they are neither plant nor animal. Fungi draw their nutrition from decaying organic matter, living plants and even animals. They do not photosynthesize as they totally lack the green pigment chlorophyll, present in green plants. Many play an important role in the natural cycle as decomposers and return nutrients to the soil, they are not all destructive." WHAT IS FUNGI? But this description would apply equally as well to most bacteria.
"These nonmotile eukaryotes lack flagella and develop from spores." [www.doctorfungus.org Dr. Fungus- Fungi, Fungus, Fungal]. But Chytridiomycota possess flagella.
Ultimately, we are left in the untenable position of admitting that there is no definition in general use for the word "fungus." Happily, this yawning gap at the threshold of mycology seems to bother mycologists even less than it bothers the Fungi themselves. Thus, in a manner sanctioned by the universal practice of man and mushroom alike, we will pointedly ignore the yawning abyss at our feet, and move on to other matters.
Characteristics of the Fungi
We never eat bread cookies For cookies have yeast, And one little bite Turns a man to a beast O, can you imagine A sadder disgrace Than a man in the gutter With crumbs on his face?
-- Song of the Salvation Army (trad.)
So, what about all those characteristics mentioned in the last section? The following is a list of the most commonly cited characters shared by most Fungi:
The Fungi are eukayotes, which may exist in nature as either single and multi-celled organisms, or in both at different points in the the life cycle.
Fungi are avascular -- no specialized respiratory, digestive or transport systems beyond the hyphae themselves.
Fungi have a vegetative body called a thallus, composed of hyphae.
The walls of hyphae are often reinforced with chitin, a polymer of N-acetylglucosamine.
The Fungi have a unique biosynthetic pathway for lysine.
Fungi produce a unique form of tubulin in connection with nuclear division.
Fungi have small nuclei with very little repetitive DNA.
Mitosis occcurs without dissolution of the nuclear membrane.
Fungi are never autotrophs. No fungus has chlorophyll or chloroplasts.
Fungi are usually found either as opportunistic saprophytes (living on dead organic matter) or in some parasitic or symbiotic relationship with plants or other autotroph.
Fungi digest food outside their bodies: they release enzymes into the surrounding environment (exoenzymes), breaking down organic matter into a form the fungus can absorb food reserves stores as glycogen (like animals), not starch (like plants).
Spores may be either sexual or asexual.
Spores may be used as a dormant, resting phase, like bacterial spores.
In short, Fungi are a rather odd, and distinctly different, part of the tree of life.
Diversity of the Fungi
The following is our usual diversity table, which somewhat overemphasizes the basal Fungi. Recent work suggests that fungal diversity may be undersampled even at the highest taxonomic levels. Specifically, a taxonomic survey of alpine fungal communities which flourished under snow cover suggests that there may be 1-2 high-level fungal taxa between Basidiomycota and Ascomycota. Schadt et al. (2003).
 C.f., " ... [L]a science culinaire, c'est de pallier, dans la mesure du possible, par la perfection de ses produits, les imprudences des hommes." Auguste Escoffier (1912).
 If you're unsure how these definitions work, see link The Cladograms: Introduction.
 "On peut et on doit déplorer de telles habitudes. Ne serait-ce qu'au point de vue de la santé des convives, dont l'estomac est appelé à en supporter les conséquences, elles sont absolument blâmables." Auguste Escoffier (1912).
Palaeos com - The Fungi
Credits Palaeos com ATW041112, phylogeny CKT061002, page modified MAK061005