Procoelomata
From Palaeos.org
| LOPHOTROCHOZOA | |
| Taxonomy | Phylogeny |
Kingdom: Metazoa
|
Protostomia `--o Lophotrochozoa [or Spiralia] `--+--Bryozoa [Ectoprocta] |--Platyzoa `--o Trochozoa |==Coeloscleritophora† ("Procoelomata†") |--Nemertea [Nemertinea] |--o Eutrochozoa | |?-Tullimonsterida † | |--Mollusca | |--Hyolitha † | |--Sipuncula | `--Annelida `--o Brachiozoa |--Phoronida `--Brachiopoda |
Among the many remarkable animals of the early Cambrian are those characterized by a protective covering of small hollow scales or sclerites. In most cases of course no trace of the animal is found, and the disarticulated sclerites are hard to associate with a particular organism. These tiny cap-shaped or scalelike skeletal elements make up the so called "small shelly fossils" that are so predominant in assemblages of Tommotian, Atdabanian and Botomian age (the so-called "Tommotian biota").
Although the creatures that bore these scales remained a mystery for some time (and in many cases still do!), it is now known that many of these tiny shelly/skeletal elements belonged to small creeping slug-like animals. They formed a sort of interlocking "coat of mail", like medieval chain mail, that protected the animal against predators.
These animals cannot be easily classified in any modern phylum, but instead form a patchwork or mosaic of characteristics of several phyla, especially the molluscs, annelids, and brachiopods, regarding which they appear to be a sort of common ancestor. Cladists would divide these creatures according to their modern relations (which may be a very difficult task, because often very little is known of them. In view of their close resemblance to each other however, another approach is to group them together in a single paraphyletic phylum, the "Procoelomata" of Bergström or the "Promollusca" of Kinman. Ironically, Bergström's term is probably too broad, since it would seem that these coat-of-mail animals are ancestral to the Lophotrochozoa (the brachiopod-annelid-mollusc clade) only, rather than coelomate animals in general; whilst Kinman's term is certainly too narrow, since they were not solely mollusc cousins. However, I have decided to retain "Procoelomata" as this is the oldest term used to designate these creatures as a group.
Although most Procoelomata died out with the early Cambrian Botomian mass-extinction (one of the largest but least known extinction events in Earth's history), a few continued to thrive right up until the Devonian, and perhaps even the Carboniferous period
[edit] Representative Orders
Classification mostly according to Valid PMPD Orders.
It is not certain that all these groups are related; it has been suggested for example that the Machaeridia may be closer to the Echinodermata.
- Class: Coeloscleritophora Bengtson & Missarzhevsky, 1981
- Order: Chancelloriida Walcott, 1920
- Order: Sachitida (incl. Halkieriida)
- Order: Siphogonuchitida
- Class: Cribricyathea
- Order: Conoidocyathida
- Order: Cribricyathida
- Order: Vologdinophyllida
- Class: Machaeridia
- Order: Hercollepadida
- Order: Turrilepadida (= Lepidocoleomorpha)
- Class: Thylacocephala
- Order: Concavicarida
- Order: Conchyliocarida
- Class: Tommotiida Missarzhevsky, 1970
- Order: Mitrosagophora Bengtson, 1977
- Order: Coleolida
- Order: Hyolithelminthes
- Order: Paiutiida
- Order: Sabelliditida
- Order: Volborthellida
- Class and Order indet.
- Family Anabaritidae Missarzhevsky, 1974
[edit] References
- Jan Bergström, 1989 "Metazoan evolution around the Precambrian-Cambrian transition", in The early evolution of Metazoa and the significance of problematic taxa, ed. by Alberto M. Simonetta and Simon Conway Morris, Cambridge University Press
- Jan Bergström, 1989, The Origin of Animal Phyla and the New Phylum Procoelomata, Lethaia 22: 259-69.
[edit] Credits
Palaeos com MAK020510; Palaeos org MAK061115
